Thanks for engaging, Jack! As you’d expect, we can’t tackle everything in a single sequence; so, you won’t get our answers to all your questions here. We say a bit more about the philosophical issues associated with going beyond EVM in this supplementary document, but since our main goal is to explore the implications of alternatives to EVM, we’re largely content to motivate those alternatives without arguing for them at length.
Re: GHD work and cluelessness, I hear the worry. We’d like to think about this more ourselves. Here’s hoping we’re able to do some work on it in the future.
Re: not all x-risk being the same, fair point. We largely focus on extinction risk and do try to flag as much in each report.
Thanks for your response, I’m excited to see your sequence. I understand you can’t cover everything of interest, but maybe my comments give ideas as to where you could do some further work.
Thanks for engaging, Jack! As you’d expect, we can’t tackle everything in a single sequence; so, you won’t get our answers to all your questions here. We say a bit more about the philosophical issues associated with going beyond EVM in this supplementary document, but since our main goal is to explore the implications of alternatives to EVM, we’re largely content to motivate those alternatives without arguing for them at length.
Re: GHD work and cluelessness, I hear the worry. We’d like to think about this more ourselves. Here’s hoping we’re able to do some work on it in the future.
Re: not all x-risk being the same, fair point. We largely focus on extinction risk and do try to flag as much in each report.
Thanks for your response, I’m excited to see your sequence. I understand you can’t cover everything of interest, but maybe my comments give ideas as to where you could do some further work.