Nathan’s comment here is one case where I really want to know what the people giving agree/​disagree votes intended to express. Agreement/​disagreement that the behaviour “doesn’t sound like Will’? Agreement/​disagreement that Naia would be unlikely to be lying? General approval/​disapproval of the comment?
I disagree-voted because I have the impression that there’s a camp of people who left Alameda that has been misleading in their public anti-SBF statements, and has a separate track record of being untrustworthy.
So, given that background, I think it’s unlikely that Will threatened someone in a strong sense of the word, and possible that Bouscal or MacAulay might be misleading, though I haven’t tried to get to the bottom of it.
Nathan’s comment here is one case where I really want to know what the people giving agree/​disagree votes intended to express. Agreement/​disagreement that the behaviour “doesn’t sound like Will’? Agreement/​disagreement that Naia would be unlikely to be lying? General approval/​disapproval of the comment?
I disagree-voted because I have the impression that there’s a camp of people who left Alameda that has been misleading in their public anti-SBF statements, and has a separate track record of being untrustworthy.
So, given that background, I think it’s unlikely that Will threatened someone in a strong sense of the word, and possible that Bouscal or MacAulay might be misleading, though I haven’t tried to get to the bottom of it.