For me, the idea was “creating a stronger public / free case that these contracts are unenforceable will make former OpenAI employees more willing to speak out / seek legal assurance that they can speak out, which in general is good for us learning more about what OpenAI is doing and more appropriately reacting to it”.
I guess lots of people out there have a non-disparagement agreement that they’re not going to question because they want a quiet life. I’d like to liberate those people (so that we can use their information) if I can.
For me, the idea was “creating a stronger public / free case that these contracts are unenforceable will make former OpenAI employees more willing to speak out / seek legal assurance that they can speak out, which in general is good for us learning more about what OpenAI is doing and more appropriately reacting to it”.
I guess lots of people out there have a non-disparagement agreement that they’re not going to question because they want a quiet life. I’d like to liberate those people (so that we can use their information) if I can.
Thanks, that’s a helpful clarification.