Sorry, I should clarify. Yes, you definitely sent me that short explanation before. But all the reasoning youāre presenting now is brand new to me.
I can believe that you intended āparticularly unproductive disagreements with other users, generally due to an overly literal interpretation on your part, or excess defensivenessā to include āpacked with difficult to dispel misunderstandingsā, but of course there was no way for me to know that.
Iām not sure how this doesnāt just come down to moderating based on the content of someoneās views as at least one major factor under consideration ā whether you decide someoneās understanding of some topic is correct or incorrect. Itās just that I thought you were disagreeing with me above when I said it seemed like an editorial decision to me. But this really makes it sound like, at least in significant part, an editorial decision.
Just to be clear, Iām not saying editorial decisions are bad. If I moderated a forum like this, I would also make editorial decisions.
Sorry, I should clarify. Yes, you definitely sent me that short explanation before. But all the reasoning youāre presenting now is brand new to me.
I can believe that you intended āparticularly unproductive disagreements with other users, generally due to an overly literal interpretation on your part, or excess defensivenessā to include āpacked with difficult to dispel misunderstandingsā, but of course there was no way for me to know that.
Iām not sure how this doesnāt just come down to moderating based on the content of someoneās views as at least one major factor under consideration ā whether you decide someoneās understanding of some topic is correct or incorrect. Itās just that I thought you were disagreeing with me above when I said it seemed like an editorial decision to me. But this really makes it sound like, at least in significant part, an editorial decision.
Just to be clear, Iām not saying editorial decisions are bad. If I moderated a forum like this, I would also make editorial decisions.