Maybe a more descriptive title next time e.g. “These ethics puzzles aren’t just challenges for utilitarianism” or something?
Despite this post being curated and me reading nearly all your posts, I personally ignored this one because it made me think it was something like “I’ve turned some sophisticated philosophical concepts/arguments into fun, simplistic games that you all can understand!”, whereas it actually makes an extremely good point that I wish people recognised much more often. (I finally gave in and read it when I saw it on the EA UK newsletter just now.)
Mostly too late now as it’s no longer curated, plus I’m only one data point and not really your target audience, but maybe still worth changing and/or a general thing to bear in mind for the future.
Maybe a more descriptive title next time e.g. “These ethics puzzles aren’t just challenges for utilitarianism” or something?
Despite this post being curated and me reading nearly all your posts, I personally ignored this one because it made me think it was something like “I’ve turned some sophisticated philosophical concepts/arguments into fun, simplistic games that you all can understand!”, whereas it actually makes an extremely good point that I wish people recognised much more often. (I finally gave in and read it when I saw it on the EA UK newsletter just now.)
Mostly too late now as it’s no longer curated, plus I’m only one data point and not really your target audience, but maybe still worth changing and/or a general thing to bear in mind for the future.
Ah, yeah that makes sense. Thanks for the feedback!