This really resonates. What stood out to me is the shift away from designing a single “ideal” end-state toward building a society that preserves flexibility, agency, and moral choice.
In the context of superintelligent AI, locking ourselves into rigid economic or governance structures too early feels like one of the biggest risks, especially for regions already underrepresented in global decision-making.
A viatopia approach feels more realistic and more ethical, it prioritizes resilience, coordination, and inclusion over premature optimization.
Thanks for sharing this, it’s a conversation we need more of.
This really resonates. What stood out to me is the shift away from designing a single “ideal” end-state toward building a society that preserves flexibility, agency, and moral choice.
In the context of superintelligent AI, locking ourselves into rigid economic or governance structures too early feels like one of the biggest risks, especially for regions already underrepresented in global decision-making.
A viatopia approach feels more realistic and more ethical, it prioritizes resilience, coordination, and inclusion over premature optimization.
Thanks for sharing this, it’s a conversation we need more of.