An anon comments elsewhere (reposted with permission):
These are very specific points. I think they verge more towards opinions he has, that he thinks others are unreasonably neglecting. i.e. does not fit how I would think about attentional blindspots
I find these interesting (possibly right): #4, #13, #15, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22
These look rather confused to me (and actually quite close to how some people in at least the rationality community already think): #3, #6 I don’t think these are in a real sense ‘alternatives’. I think they are complementary, interconnected as part of human perception and expression.
#9. consequentialist cluelessness being a severe challenge to longtermism I think the way people like Amanda Askell and Will MacAskill have thought zoned in on abstact concepts of uncertainty here (also as in moral uncertainty) is itself somewhat confused, because it looks like it has no sound grounding with reality (does not regard representational ambiguity or deeper principles for understanding phenomena). I think there is a case for embodied ethics though.
#2. mental health gains far above baseline as an important x-risk reduction factor via improved decision-making Can see how nurturing mental health is important, this framing and others come across as rather reductionistic (in a counterproductive way—since disconnecting from recognising shared perspectives and feeling care towards others as oneself—as EAs seem to do when they talk about ‘self-care’).
An anon comments elsewhere (reposted with permission):