I upvoted this comment, since I think it’s a correct critique of poor quality studies and adds important context, but I also wanted to flag that I also broadly think Athena is a worthwhile initiative and I’m glad it’s happening! (In line with Lewis’ argument below). I think it can create bad vibes for the highest voted comment on a post about promoting diversity to be critical
Usually, if someone proposes something and then cites loads of weak literature supporting it, criticism is warranted. I think it is a good norm for people promoting anything to make good arguments for it and provide good evidence.
I upvoted this comment, since I think it’s a correct critique of poor quality studies and adds important context, but I also wanted to flag that I also broadly think Athena is a worthwhile initiative and I’m glad it’s happening! (In line with Lewis’ argument below). I think it can create bad vibes for the highest voted comment on a post about promoting diversity to be critical
Usually, if someone proposes something and then cites loads of weak literature supporting it, criticism is warranted. I think it is a good norm for people promoting anything to make good arguments for it and provide good evidence.
Agreed!
+1, I appreciate you for upvoting the parent comment and then leaving this reply :)
(Edit: for what it’s worth, I am also excited Athena is happening)