On reflection, contempt for person-affecting intuitions could also be something OP was “not seeing”, and I agree more generally you give a good-faith response to the OP (although I think the charge of being too divorced from humane values is still false, misleading and offensive). I’ve just removed my downvote on your top comment.
I still stick by my criticisms of the article (that I haven’t already retracted), though, and stick by making them here, because I think the article has enough important issues to be worth pointing out when it’s shared.
On reflection, contempt for person-affecting intuitions could also be something OP was “not seeing”, and I agree more generally you give a good-faith response to the OP (although I think the charge of being too divorced from humane values is still false, misleading and offensive). I’ve just removed my downvote on your top comment.
I still stick by my criticisms of the article (that I haven’t already retracted), though, and stick by making them here, because I think the article has enough important issues to be worth pointing out when it’s shared.