Toby Ord claimed that x-risk reduction was worth pursing regardless of [whether] x-risk was high or low.
A priori, it seems unlikely that the ROI to working on x-risk would be a constant function of the level of x-risk.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
A priori, it seems unlikely that the ROI to working on x-risk would be a constant function of the level of x-risk.