Thanks for this! For what itâs worth, some issues Iâve found with the âCRIBSâ and âEA Epistemic Auditorâ reviews for drafts of philosophical blog posts:
excessively allergic to âhedgingâ, and to sections of posts meant to preempt very important misreadings
flagging some points as âhidden assumptionsâ even when theyâre explicitly addressed in the post, or seem clearly irrelevant to the argument
critiquing claim X as not empirically supported, when X is the claim âY isnât empirically supportedâ.
But theyâre somewhat useful for surfacing what kinds of misunderstandings readers might have.
Thanks for this! For what itâs worth, some issues Iâve found with the âCRIBSâ and âEA Epistemic Auditorâ reviews for drafts of philosophical blog posts:
excessively allergic to âhedgingâ, and to sections of posts meant to preempt very important misreadings
flagging some points as âhidden assumptionsâ even when theyâre explicitly addressed in the post, or seem clearly irrelevant to the argument
critiquing claim X as not empirically supported, when X is the claim âY isnât empirically supportedâ.
But theyâre somewhat useful for surfacing what kinds of misunderstandings readers might have.