Thanks! I guess given a choice between somewhere-uniquely-optimal actions, you should first check if any of them are ruled out by non-consequentialist considerations (like deontological constraints). If you still have multiple options at that stage, then the view I’ve sketched here will say that they’re each permissible and that you can choose between them how you like. In practice, I’d try to choose the action that’s somewhere-uniquely-optimal on my forced-to-say-a-number probability function, for moral uncertainty sorts of reasons.
Thanks! I guess given a choice between somewhere-uniquely-optimal actions, you should first check if any of them are ruled out by non-consequentialist considerations (like deontological constraints). If you still have multiple options at that stage, then the view I’ve sketched here will say that they’re each permissible and that you can choose between them how you like. In practice, I’d try to choose the action that’s somewhere-uniquely-optimal on my forced-to-say-a-number probability function, for moral uncertainty sorts of reasons.