This is just speculation, but I wonder if it’s more cost-effective to donate to a Senate candidate who is also running in a Presidential swing state? Maybe Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, or Arizona?
It seems plausible that a strong Senate candidate could inspire voters to get out and vote for a President they’re not enthusiastic about—essentially a ‘reverse coattails’ effect (though I don’t think there’s particularly strong evidence for this)
This is just speculation, but I wonder if it’s more cost-effective to donate to a Senate candidate who is also running in a Presidential swing state? Maybe Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, or Arizona?
It seems plausible that a strong Senate candidate could inspire voters to get out and vote for a President they’re not enthusiastic about—essentially a ‘reverse coattails’ effect (though I don’t think there’s particularly strong evidence for this)
or Governor candidates in states like North Carolina