I’m voting yes because I think more people interested in EA should seriously consider earning to give as a career path, which is much higher absorbency and (IMO) important for the health of our movement.
So I’d be interested in a world where folks learning about EA seriously consider earning to give more, and if they do so I expect the population of people EtG would increase. (I’m also with 80K here that I’d only advocate for more EtG if your job doesn’t do direct harm).
I haven’t thought hard about whether people currently working in direct impact jobs should switch over to earning to give.
I’d be interested in hearing more career stories of people who have been earning to give for a while!
I’m voting yes because I think more people interested in EA should seriously consider earning to give as a career path, which is much higher absorbency and (IMO) important for the health of our movement.
So I’d be interested in a world where folks learning about EA seriously consider earning to give more, and if they do so I expect the population of people EtG would increase. (I’m also with 80K here that I’d only advocate for more EtG if your job doesn’t do direct harm).
I haven’t thought hard about whether people currently working in direct impact jobs should switch over to earning to give.
I’d be interested in hearing more career stories of people who have been earning to give for a while!