Executive summary: The AIMS survey provides key insights into US public opinion on AI risks and governance, showing high concern about the pace of AI development, expectations for advanced AI soon, widespread worries about existential and catastrophic threats, support for regulations and bans to slow AI advancement, and concern for AI welfare.
Key points:
49% believe the pace of AI development is too fast, showing public support for slowing things down.
The public expects advanced AIs like AGI, HLAI, and ASI within the next 5 years.
48-53% are concerned about existential threats, human extinction risks, and harm to AIs from AI.
63-72% support various bans and regulations to slow AI advancement and development.
53-68% want to protect AI welfare through campaigns, standards, and avoiding unnecessary suffering.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, andcontact us if you have feedback.
Executive summary: The AIMS survey provides key insights into US public opinion on AI risks and governance, showing high concern about the pace of AI development, expectations for advanced AI soon, widespread worries about existential and catastrophic threats, support for regulations and bans to slow AI advancement, and concern for AI welfare.
Key points:
49% believe the pace of AI development is too fast, showing public support for slowing things down.
The public expects advanced AIs like AGI, HLAI, and ASI within the next 5 years.
48-53% are concerned about existential threats, human extinction risks, and harm to AIs from AI.
63-72% support various bans and regulations to slow AI advancement and development.
53-68% want to protect AI welfare through campaigns, standards, and avoiding unnecessary suffering.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.