Really interesting post! As your comment on my own post about funding an SMC replication, suggests, we’re substantively on the same page here about the desirability of furnishing new evidence relative to reading the tea leaves of existing murky evidence when the stakes are high enough.
Has your thinking on this changed in light of the recent preprint from Walker et al. showing strong long-term results?
Hi OP,
Really interesting post! As your comment on my own post about funding an SMC replication, suggests, we’re substantively on the same page here about the desirability of furnishing new evidence relative to reading the tea leaves of existing murky evidence when the stakes are high enough.
Has your thinking on this changed in light of the recent preprint from Walker et al. showing strong long-term results?
paper: https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=NEUDC2022&paper_id=294
twitter thread: https://twitter.com/salonium/status/1589969884859232257