I like conspiracy theories, but an economic one is more probable than a political governmental affair. I think Coinbase and Binance may did something in the no-law-only-code world of crypto, but the target was FTX, a very visible competitor; the funds for EA activities were just collateral damage. To mitigate risks like that, EA aligned organizations should not rely on single source for funding.
I like conspiracy theories, but an economic one is more probable than a political governmental affair.
This is not a conspiracy theory, it’s basic risk management for any large organization that has its own ideas about various nation-state level status quos such as biosecurity.
I stated that it was probably economic, and probably not governmental. This is basic risk management. A 94/6% risk split clearly merits further investigation, given that 6% chance is covert activity targeting EA.
I like conspiracy theories, but an economic one is more probable than a political governmental affair. I think Coinbase and Binance may did something in the no-law-only-code world of crypto, but the target was FTX, a very visible competitor; the funds for EA activities were just collateral damage. To mitigate risks like that, EA aligned organizations should not rely on single source for funding.
This is not a conspiracy theory, it’s basic risk management for any large organization that has its own ideas about various nation-state level status quos such as biosecurity.
I stated that it was probably economic, and probably not governmental. This is basic risk management. A 94/6% risk split clearly merits further investigation, given that 6% chance is covert activity targeting EA.