The reason this is not ‘right back where we started’ is I think most people find it much easier to evaluate a single human (a task we practice all our lives at, and did in the ancestral environment) than to evaluate large organisations (a much more difficult skill, with worse feedback mechanisms, that did not exist in the ancestral environment).
Sure, that seems reasonable. Another point is that large groups may have competing internal factions, which could create a source of variability in their decision-making which makes their decisions harder to understand and predict.
Lower variability with the CEO approach should mean a smaller sample size is required to get a bead on their decision-making style.
BTW, did you get the private message I sent you regarding a typo in your original comment? Wondering if private messages are working properly.
Sure, that seems reasonable. Another point is that large groups may have competing internal factions, which could create a source of variability in their decision-making which makes their decisions harder to understand and predict.
Lower variability with the CEO approach should mean a smaller sample size is required to get a bead on their decision-making style.
BTW, did you get the private message I sent you regarding a typo in your original comment? Wondering if private messages are working properly.