Is perhaps testable by RCT amongst earn-to-givers because we could quantitatively measure their impact more easily.
Perhaps one group is coached on taking more small altruistic actions, the other is coached to preserve their resources for the big moments / decisions. I think six months to one year with yearly followups would be a suitable length.
I think limiting factor would be number of earn-to-givers willing to partake. Any other ways this could be tested objectively? It does seem very important to know, and it seems there’s little compelling evidence either way.
Is perhaps testable by RCT amongst earn-to-givers because we could quantitatively measure their impact more easily.
Perhaps one group is coached on taking more small altruistic actions, the other is coached to preserve their resources for the big moments / decisions. I think six months to one year with yearly followups would be a suitable length.
I think limiting factor would be number of earn-to-givers willing to partake. Any other ways this could be tested objectively? It does seem very important to know, and it seems there’s little compelling evidence either way.