As for the last sentence, I think it depends on the nature of the criticism/proposal. Here, I think it’s fair to critique Michael’s proposal on the grounds that it does not acknowledge that the plausible range of action for almost anyone but Open Phil is substantially constrained by Open Phil’s willingness to go along.
That being said, “this seems fairly easy, is there a reason you you don’t do it” can be a valid line of argument in appropriate circumstances.
I’d also like to call positive attention to Michael taking a concrete step that could involve a significant personal commitment of time (i.e., applying to be on the EVF board) in addition to writing on the Forum about the issue he sees.
Upvoted; thanks.
As for the last sentence, I think it depends on the nature of the criticism/proposal. Here, I think it’s fair to critique Michael’s proposal on the grounds that it does not acknowledge that the plausible range of action for almost anyone but Open Phil is substantially constrained by Open Phil’s willingness to go along.
That being said, “this seems fairly easy, is there a reason you you don’t do it” can be a valid line of argument in appropriate circumstances.
I’d also like to call positive attention to Michael taking a concrete step that could involve a significant personal commitment of time (i.e., applying to be on the EVF board) in addition to writing on the Forum about the issue he sees.