1. Overall thoughtful and helpful, but one major error which I hope you will be relieved to know about, and I’m sure others will:
>Assuming I’m right that, currently, perception doesn’t match reality, it means the core projects and people in EA should communicate more about what they are and are not taking responsibility for.
I think this is very unlikely to be successful, and places a huge unwelcome “should” on a bunch of busy EAs, some of who won’t be good at doing PR/comms/promo work on their own role.
It would be much better, easier and quicker to have a comms team or podcast or youtube channel with the specific responsibility to build an accurate perception, namely that EA is a fleet or regatta, and not a supertanker.
I would love to hear interviews in a podcast of senior EAs focused on their role and responsibilities and differences between perception and reality, what gaps they see that do-ers could fill.
1. Overall thoughtful and helpful, but one major error which I hope you will be relieved to know about, and I’m sure others will:
>Assuming I’m right that, currently, perception doesn’t match reality, it means the core projects and people in EA should communicate more about what they are and are not taking responsibility for.
I think this is very unlikely to be successful, and places a huge unwelcome “should” on a bunch of busy EAs, some of who won’t be good at doing PR/comms/promo work on their own role.
It would be much better, easier and quicker to have a comms team or podcast or youtube channel with the specific responsibility to build an accurate perception, namely that EA is a fleet or regatta, and not a supertanker.
I would love to hear interviews in a podcast of senior EAs focused on their role and responsibilities and differences between perception and reality, what gaps they see that do-ers could fill.
2. In separate comment