Not a downvoter, but the post is really unclear to me, doesnât seem to have a coherent point, and doesnât justify claims. Also, it doesnât seem relevant to effective altruism, which has <50% overlap with the rationality community.
There are good criticisms of EA, including good criticisms of the form âEA should be more welcomingâ, but theyâre way more developed and coherent.
The EAF is using LessWrong 2.0 forum architecture, which shapes itsâ culture tremendously. In particular, thereâs a general expectation that good criticism has to be longwinded.
That said, this is a very helpful summary of what locals think is going on. Thank you!
Not a downvoter, but the post is really unclear to me, doesnât seem to have a coherent point, and doesnât justify claims. Also, it doesnât seem relevant to effective altruism, which has <50% overlap with the rationality community.
There are good criticisms of EA, including good criticisms of the form âEA should be more welcomingâ, but theyâre way more developed and coherent.
The EAF is using LessWrong 2.0 forum architecture, which shapes itsâ culture tremendously. In particular, thereâs a general expectation that good criticism has to be longwinded.
That said, this is a very helpful summary of what locals think is going on. Thank you!