Thanks. I will update the analysis using 95 % (= (0.9 + 1)/​2), which results in the same expected cost-effectiveness as using a uniform distribution ranging from 90 % to 100 %.
Thanks. I will update the analysis using 95 % (= (0.9 + 1)/​2), which results in the same expected cost-effectiveness as using a uniform distribution ranging from 90 % to 100 %.