My estimate for the past cost-effectiveness of HSI is:28.7 times my estimate for the cost-effectiveness of corporate campaigns for chicken welfare of 15.0 DALY/$.43.4 k times my estimate for the cost-effectiveness of GiveWell’s top charities of 0.00994 DALY/$.
My estimate for the past cost-effectiveness of HSI is:
28.7 times my estimate for the cost-effectiveness of corporate campaigns for chicken welfare of 15.0 DALY/$.
43.4 k times my estimate for the cost-effectiveness of GiveWell’s top charities of 0.00994 DALY/$.
For HSI to be as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities, for example, one of the following would have to happen:
All my pain intensities becoming 0.00230 % (= 1/(43.4*10^3)) as high.
The welfare range of shrimp becoming 0.00230 % as high, i.e. 7.13*10^-7 (= 0.031*2.30*10^-5).
All my pain intensities and the welfare range of shrimp each becoming 0.480 % (= (2.30*10^-5)^0.5) as high.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
For HSI to be as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities, for example, one of the following would have to happen:
All my pain intensities becoming 0.00230 % (= 1/(43.4*10^3)) as high.
The welfare range of shrimp becoming 0.00230 % as high, i.e. 7.13*10^-7 (= 0.031*2.30*10^-5).
All my pain intensities and the welfare range of shrimp each becoming 0.480 % (= (2.30*10^-5)^0.5) as high.