My estimate for the past cost-effectiveness of HSI is:28.7 times my estimate for the cost-effectiveness of corporate campaigns for chicken welfare of 15.0 DALY/​$.43.4 k times my estimate for the cost-effectiveness of GiveWell’s top charities of 0.00994 DALY/​$.
My estimate for the past cost-effectiveness of HSI is:
28.7 times my estimate for the cost-effectiveness of corporate campaigns for chicken welfare of 15.0 DALY/​$.
43.4 k times my estimate for the cost-effectiveness of GiveWell’s top charities of 0.00994 DALY/​$.
For HSI to be as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities, for example, one of the following would have to happen:
All my pain intensities becoming 0.00230 % (= 1/​(43.4*10^3)) as high.
The welfare range of shrimp becoming 0.00230 % as high, i.e. 7.13*10^-7 (= 0.031*2.30*10^-5).
All my pain intensities and the welfare range of shrimp each becoming 0.480 % (= (2.30*10^-5)^0.5) as high.
For HSI to be as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities, for example, one of the following would have to happen:
All my pain intensities becoming 0.00230 % (= 1/​(43.4*10^3)) as high.
The welfare range of shrimp becoming 0.00230 % as high, i.e. 7.13*10^-7 (= 0.031*2.30*10^-5).
All my pain intensities and the welfare range of shrimp each becoming 0.480 % (= (2.30*10^-5)^0.5) as high.