I believe that describing academic literature incorrectly in a way that benefits your case is unacceptable. I’m honestly surprised I need to spell this out explicitly, given that your About page says:
I care passionately about the truth, not just at work as a scientist but in all aspects of my life.
Is it really a matter of incorrectness or just that you think that argument is really important and he didn’t include it? There are plenty of innocent reasons he might not have included that argument or many others. He might have thought it was a weak argument or maybe didn’t include it because it wasn’t relevant to his personal objections to NU.
I believe that describing academic literature incorrectly in a way that benefits your case is unacceptable. I’m honestly surprised I need to spell this out explicitly, given that your About page says:
Is it really a matter of incorrectness or just that you think that argument is really important and he didn’t include it? There are plenty of innocent reasons he might not have included that argument or many others. He might have thought it was a weak argument or maybe didn’t include it because it wasn’t relevant to his personal objections to NU.