Yeah, the chatbot also gives a reply to “Why do they think that? Why care about AI risk?”, which is a UX problem, it hasn’t been a priority.
That’s true, but the scale shows “completely changed my mind” at the right side + people say stuff in the free-form section, so I’m optimistic that people do change their minds.
Some people say 0⁄10 because they’ve already been convinced. (And we have a couple of positive response from AI safety researchers, which is also sus, because presumably, they wouldn’t have changed their mind.) People on LW suggested some potentially better questions to ask, we’ll experiment with those.
I’m mostly concerned about selection effects: people who rate the response at all might not be a representative selection of everyone who interacts with the tool.
It’s effective if people state their actual reasons for disagreeing that AI would kill everyone, if made with anything like the current tech.
Yeah, the chatbot also gives a reply to “Why do they think that? Why care about AI risk?”, which is a UX problem, it hasn’t been a priority.
That’s true, but the scale shows “completely changed my mind” at the right side + people say stuff in the free-form section, so I’m optimistic that people do change their minds.
Some people say 0⁄10 because they’ve already been convinced. (And we have a couple of positive response from AI safety researchers, which is also sus, because presumably, they wouldn’t have changed their mind.) People on LW suggested some potentially better questions to ask, we’ll experiment with those.
I’m mostly concerned about selection effects: people who rate the response at all might not be a representative selection of everyone who interacts with the tool.
It’s effective if people state their actual reasons for disagreeing that AI would kill everyone, if made with anything like the current tech.