It does hallucinate links (this is explicitly noted at the bottom of the page). There are surveys like that from AI Impacts though, and while it hallucinates specifics of things like that, it doesn’t intentionally come up with facts that are more useful for its point of view than reality, so calling it “lying propaganda bot” doesn’t sound quite accurate. E.g., here’s from AI Impacts:
This comes up very rarely; the overwhelming majority of the conversations focuses on the actual arguments, not on what some surveyed scientists think.
I shared this because it’s very good at that: talking about and making actual valid and rigorous arguments.
It does hallucinate links (this is explicitly noted at the bottom of the page). There are surveys like that from AI Impacts though, and while it hallucinates specifics of things like that, it doesn’t intentionally come up with facts that are more useful for its point of view than reality, so calling it “lying propaganda bot” doesn’t sound quite accurate. E.g., here’s from AI Impacts:
This comes up very rarely; the overwhelming majority of the conversations focuses on the actual arguments, not on what some surveyed scientists think.
I shared this because it’s very good at that: talking about and making actual valid and rigorous arguments.