if one wants longtermism to get a few big wins to increase its movement building appeal, it would surprise me if the way to do this was through more earning to give, rather than by spending down longtermism’s big pot of money and using some of its labor for direct work
I agree – I think the practical implication is more “this consideration updates us towards funding/allocating labor towards direct work over explicit movement building” and less “this consideration updates us towards E2G over direct work/movement building”.
I agree – I think the practical implication is more “this consideration updates us towards funding/allocating labor towards direct work over explicit movement building” and less “this consideration updates us towards E2G over direct work/movement building”.