Even if the goal is communication, it could be the case that normalizing strong attractive titles could lead to more clickbait-y EA content. For example, we could get: “10 Reasons Why [INSERT_PERSON] Wants to Destroy EA.”
Of course, we still need some prioritization system to determine which posts are worth reading (typically via number of upvotes).
Idk, I would just downvote posts with unproductively bad titles, and not downvote posts with strong but justified titles. Further posts that seem superficially justified but actually don’t justify the title properly are also things I dislike and downvote. I don’t think we need a slippery slope argument here when the naive strategy works fine
Even if the goal is communication, it could be the case that normalizing strong attractive titles could lead to more clickbait-y EA content. For example, we could get: “10 Reasons Why [INSERT_PERSON] Wants to Destroy EA.”
Of course, we still need some prioritization system to determine which posts are worth reading (typically via number of upvotes).
Idk, I would just downvote posts with unproductively bad titles, and not downvote posts with strong but justified titles. Further posts that seem superficially justified but actually don’t justify the title properly are also things I dislike and downvote. I don’t think we need a slippery slope argument here when the naive strategy works fine