I think your position compels you to say that not only is it better to donate to AW over GHD, it is actually better to set money on fire rather than donate it to GHD. Or spend it on a yacht, or a castle, or a pile of video games. With that framing, I think you’re back down to 1% territory.
I do not have a strong view either way. It depends on the details of the global health intervention. Note “I am not confident that saving human lives in China, India or Nigeria is harmful to animals. Even if it is so for farmed animals nearterm [my results refer to 2022], it can still be beneficial overall”.
I think your position compels you to say that not only is it better to donate to AW over GHD, it is actually better to set money on fire rather than donate it to GHD. Or spend it on a yacht, or a castle, or a pile of video games. With that framing, I think you’re back down to 1% territory.
I do not have a strong view either way. It depends on the details of the global health intervention. Note “I am not confident that saving human lives in China, India or Nigeria is harmful to animals. Even if it is so for farmed animals nearterm [my results refer to 2022], it can still be beneficial overall”.