There is sort of precedent for this: science used to be much more argumentative, and now, most of science is done in very intelligent ways, aimed at getting to the RIGHT answer, and not âtheir answerâ. This led to many, if not most or all, scientific problems being solved*.
In addition, if you aim to be a powerful scientist, fighting for âyour answerâ makes it much harder than it is if you were fighting for the RIGHT answer.
Similarly, if this project worked well, it would be much harder to gain power if you fought for âyour valuesâ than if you fought for the RIGHT values!
There is sort of precedent for this: science used to be much more argumentative, and now, most of science is done in very intelligent ways, aimed at getting to the RIGHT answer, and not âtheir answerâ. This led to many, if not most or all, scientific problems being solved*.
In addition, if you aim to be a powerful scientist, fighting for âyour answerâ makes it much harder than it is if you were fighting for the RIGHT answer. Similarly, if this project worked well, it would be much harder to gain power if you fought for âyour valuesâ than if you fought for the RIGHT values!