I think one especially valuable way to do this would be to commission/pay non-EA people with good epistemics to critique essays on core EA ideas. There are various philosophers/others I can think of who would be well-placed to do this—people like caplan, Michael Huemer, David Enoch, Richard Arneson etc.
I think it would also be good to have short online essay colloquia following the model of Cato Unbound.
I think one especially valuable way to do this would be to commission/pay non-EA people with good epistemics to critique essays on core EA ideas. There are various philosophers/others I can think of who would be well-placed to do this—people like caplan, Michael Huemer, David Enoch, Richard Arneson etc.
I think it would also be good to have short online essay colloquia following the model of Cato Unbound.