It would be interesting to see a cohort analysis of 80k advisees by year, looking at what each advisee from each cohort has accomplished out in the world in the following years.
Maybe that already exists? I haven’t seen it, if so.
In the sentence you quoted, you literally state that 80k tracks the # of calls and # of career plan changes, but doesn’t track the long-run impacts of their advisees.
Saying “80k tracks the # of calls and # of career plan changes, but doesn’t track the long-run impacts of their advisees” is different from saying “80k focus[es] mainly on # of calls”
“Where do you get the impression that they focus mainly on # of calls?”
I don’t have this impression. From the original post:
It would be interesting to see a cohort analysis of 80k advisees by year, looking at what each advisee from each cohort has accomplished out in the world in the following years.
Maybe that already exists? I haven’t seen it, if so.
In the sentence you quoted, you literally state that 80k tracks the # of calls and # of career plan changes, but doesn’t track the long-run impacts of their advisees.
Saying “80k tracks the # of calls and # of career plan changes, but doesn’t track the long-run impacts of their advisees” is different from saying “80k focus[es] mainly on # of calls”