Looks like a great organization. However, a SROI of 4.43 seems modest. Here, for example, they find an average cost-efectiveness ((tax-payer benefits + non-taxpayer benefits) /β cost) of positive intevertions in US (!) social policy to be 22 (coud drop to 16 if we include the 20% with negative benefit interventions), and for health intervetions in poor countries about 58 (see footnote 9 in reference above). Is the SROI you use the same as these cost-effectiveness ratios, or could you offer a comparable metric?
Looks like a great organization.
However, a SROI of 4.43 seems modest. Here, for example, they find an average cost-efectiveness ((tax-payer benefits + non-taxpayer benefits) /β cost) of positive intevertions in US (!) social policy to be 22 (coud drop to 16 if we include the 20% with negative benefit interventions), and for health intervetions in poor countries about 58 (see footnote 9 in reference above).
Is the SROI you use the same as these cost-effectiveness ratios, or could you offer a comparable metric?
Thank you!