I know this isn’t the central part of the post but I’m not sure the title is really clickbait. It seems like an accurate headline to me? I understand clickbait to be “the intentional act of over-promising or otherwise misrepresenting — in a headline, on social media, in an image, or some combination — what you’re going to find when you read a story on the web.” Source.
A real clickbait title for this would be something like “The one secret fact FTX doesn’t want you to know” or “Grantmakers hate him! One weird trick to make spending transparent”
Not long enough for the formatting to matter in my opinion. We can, and should, encourage people to post some low-effort posts, as long as they’re an original thought.
One of the the EA forum norms that I like to see is people explaining why they downvoted a post/comment so I’m a bit annoyed that NegativeNuno’s comment that supported this norm was fairly heavily downvoted (without explanation).
I disagree with your reasons for downvoting the post, since I generally judge posts on their content, but I do appreciate your transparency here and found it interesting to see that you disliked a post for these reasons. I’m tempted to upvote your comment, though that feels weird since I disagree with it
Downvoted because of the clickbait title and the terrible formatting
I know this isn’t the central part of the post but I’m not sure the title is really clickbait. It seems like an accurate headline to me? I understand clickbait to be “the intentional act of over-promising or otherwise misrepresenting — in a headline, on social media, in an image, or some combination — what you’re going to find when you read a story on the web.” Source.
A real clickbait title for this would be something like “The one secret fact FTX doesn’t want you to know” or “Grantmakers hate him! One weird trick to make spending transparent”
Personally, I don’t have a problem with the title. It clearly states the central point of the post.
Not long enough for the formatting to matter in my opinion. We can, and should, encourage people to post some low-effort posts, as long as they’re an original thought.
One of the the EA forum norms that I like to see is people explaining why they downvoted a post/comment so I’m a bit annoyed that NegativeNuno’s comment that supported this norm was fairly heavily downvoted (without explanation).
I disagree with your reasons for downvoting the post, since I generally judge posts on their content, but I do appreciate your transparency here and found it interesting to see that you disliked a post for these reasons. I’m tempted to upvote your comment, though that feels weird since I disagree with it