Itās not clear the anecdotes in that section are real and not made-up. Kat is dodging questions about it, so for all we know, it could be the case that everyone referenced in that section was a Nonlinear employee who feels bad due to Benās post. Some people elsewhere in this thread theorized that itās Kat describing herself, and strangely but conspicuously, she hasnāt denied it.
Edit: I misread what you were saying. I thought you were saying āKat has dodged questions about whether it was trueā, and āItās not clear the anecdotes are being presentedas realā.
Kat is responding to other questions in this thread, but not ones about the āSharing Information on Ben Paceā section.
Itās not clear that the anecdotes are from someone outside of Nonlinear who had some bad experience with Ben Pace other than Ben publishing the original post about Nonlinear.
Itās not clear whether Kat wants people to think that itās about some unmotivated third party, or if itās supposed to be obvious that itās Kat writing her own experience in third person. She did write in the post that you shouldnāt update on it, but maybe she wants it to be ambiguous, which has the effect of discrediting Ben. She says that if the person itās referring to said these things publicly, people would disagree 50ā50 on whether Ben did something bad, which sure does sound a lot like itās talking about this whole controversy.
Other people in this thread are saying itās obvious, but Iām really confused.
If it is, in fact, based someone from Nonlinear, then Iād agree that the section is bad. At that point, it would no longer be a valid example of ālook, you can do this to anyoneā.
Itās not clear the anecdotes in that section are real and not made-up. Kat is dodging questions about it, so for all we know, it could be the case that everyone referenced in that section was a Nonlinear employee who feels bad due to Benās post. Some people elsewhere in this thread theorized that itās Kat describing herself, and strangely but conspicuously, she hasnāt denied it.
Edit: I misread what you were saying. I thought you were saying āKat has dodged questions about whether it was trueā, and āItās not clear the anecdotes are being presented as realā.
Actually, Katsaid it was true.Kat is responding to other questions in this thread, but not ones about the āSharing Information on Ben Paceā section.
Itās not clear that the anecdotes are from someone outside of Nonlinear who had some bad experience with Ben Pace other than Ben publishing the original post about Nonlinear.
Itās not clear whether Kat wants people to think that itās about some unmotivated third party, or if itās supposed to be obvious that itās Kat writing her own experience in third person. She did write in the post that you shouldnāt update on it, but maybe she wants it to be ambiguous, which has the effect of discrediting Ben. She says that if the person itās referring to said these things publicly, people would disagree 50ā50 on whether Ben did something bad, which sure does sound a lot like itās talking about this whole controversy.
Other people in this thread are saying itās obvious, but Iām really confused.
If it is, in fact, based someone from Nonlinear, then Iād agree that the section is bad. At that point, it would no longer be a valid example of ālook, you can do this to anyoneā.