While I agree that the discussion here is bad at all those metrics, I’m not sure how you infer that the CH team does better at e.g. fairness or compassion.
Based on public criticisms of their work and also reading some documents about a case where we were deciding whether to admit someone to some event (and they forwarded their communication with CH). It’s a limited evidence, but still some evidence.
While I agree that the discussion here is bad at all those metrics, I’m not sure how you infer that the CH team does better at e.g. fairness or compassion.
Based on public criticisms of their work and also reading some documents about a case where we were deciding whether to admit someone to some event (and they forwarded their communication with CH). It’s a limited evidence, but still some evidence.