Agreed! Do you have an idea about the economic cost of factory-farming as a fraction of gross world product? The EAT-Lancet diet has 12.2 % (= (153 + 30 + 62 + 19 + 40)/ā2500; see Table 1) of calories coming from animals, and, according to the results of 3 approaches, would decrease adult deaths by 21.7 % (= (0.19 + 0.224 + 0.236)/ā3; see Table 2). If this is so, even if āhindering structural transformationā is very far down the list of bad things about animal agriculture, it could still be up the list of good things to boost economic growth?
Agreed! Do you have an idea about the economic cost of factory-farming as a fraction of gross world product? The EAT-Lancet diet has 12.2 % (= (153 + 30 + 62 + 19 + 40)/ā2500; see Table 1) of calories coming from animals, and, according to the results of 3 approaches, would decrease adult deaths by 21.7 % (= (0.19 + 0.224 + 0.236)/ā3; see Table 2). If this is so, even if āhindering structural transformationā is very far down the list of bad things about animal agriculture, it could still be up the list of good things to boost economic growth?
I doubt it would be, for suspicious convergence reasons, but Iām not informed enough to know.