I want to run this at some point. Pro statistical consultants could handle many posts, and philosophy grad students many of the rest. I was thinking in terms of one review per important post here.
Riffing further:
Academic peer review generally doesn’t run code, so this is one way we could surpass them.
Also publishing the reviews,
and doing them within a month, rather than within a year.
I want to run this at some point. Pro statistical consultants could handle many posts, and philosophy grad students many of the rest. I was thinking in terms of one review per important post here.
Riffing further:
Academic peer review generally doesn’t run code, so this is one way we could surpass them.
Also publishing the reviews,
and doing them within a month, rather than within a year.
“And doing them within a month, rather than within a year.”—Might be hard to determine what posts are important after just a month?
I’d be fine with some false positives