Is it possible to see the code and/or maths somewhere? It would be pretty neat make a standardised implementations of different allocation methods broadly accessible! Additionally, many results are quite sensitive to subtle choices like default parameters, scales and non-linearities used to express marginal diminishing “returns”, right?
(At first, I was a bit confused that the “Maximise Excpected Choiceworthiness” solution did not end up with 100% on one option, but then I saw that “Diminishing Marginal Returns” was switched on in “Settings”. Is there any philosophical support for this non-linearity in the case of intertheoretic comparisons?)
Thanks for sharing, this is cool!
Is it possible to see the code and/or maths somewhere? It would be pretty neat make a standardised implementations of different allocation methods broadly accessible! Additionally, many results are quite sensitive to subtle choices like default parameters, scales and non-linearities used to express marginal diminishing “returns”, right?
(At first, I was a bit confused that the “Maximise Excpected Choiceworthiness” solution did not end up with 100% on one option, but then I saw that “Diminishing Marginal Returns” was switched on in “Settings”. Is there any philosophical support for this non-linearity in the case of intertheoretic comparisons?)
edit: found it here: https://github.com/rethinkpriorities/moral-parliament/tree/master/server/allocate