It occurs to me that a person could create a nonprofit competitor to ChatGPT, which makes use of open models and donates excess revenue to AI alignment research. That way you can pay for a chatbot without contributing to AI advancement.
I joke, but I think switching to Claude is cheaper. Though, I get the sense that many people interested in boycotting ChatGPT are anti-LLMs in general due to concerns about art or water usage, which strike me as less important than existensial risks.
It occurs to me that a person could create a nonprofit competitor to ChatGPT, which makes use of open models and donates excess revenue to AI alignment research. That way you can pay for a chatbot without contributing to AI advancement.
We can even call it OpenAI!
I joke, but I think switching to Claude is cheaper. Though, I get the sense that many people interested in boycotting ChatGPT are anti-LLMs in general due to concerns about art or water usage, which strike me as less important than existensial risks.
Edited for spelling mistakes.