What does he think of more academic global priorities research institutions like the Global Priorities Institute?
Does he think their work is more or less important than the more empirical global priorities research Rethink does?
Should Rethink engage with this more fundamental research to guide their own research and to what extent do they currently do this?
What is Rethink’s justification for working in multiple cause areas?
Shouldn’t they just pick the one they think is highest impact and work in that one?
Once having completed research, what is Rethink’s strategy to getting it heard and acted on by those that need to?
Are there any difficulties here?
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
What does he think of more academic global priorities research institutions like the Global Priorities Institute?
Does he think their work is more or less important than the more empirical global priorities research Rethink does?
Should Rethink engage with this more fundamental research to guide their own research and to what extent do they currently do this?
What is Rethink’s justification for working in multiple cause areas?
Shouldn’t they just pick the one they think is highest impact and work in that one?
Once having completed research, what is Rethink’s strategy to getting it heard and acted on by those that need to?
Are there any difficulties here?