There are some functions that should be housed in an organization with significant financial, operational, and legal independence from the main EA organizations. That would require either community funding, or a long-term grant. I was envisioning that such an organization should be available to coordinate the investigation of alleged misconduct by senior EAs, and I think having certain survivor-support functions housed outside of CEA would serve the interests of both survivors and CEA (which then wouldn’t have to worry about managing potentially serious conflicts of interest).
I don’t have a clear opinion on whether / to what extent most of EA’s response to misconduct more generally should be housed in an independent organization.
There are some functions that should be housed in an organization with significant financial, operational, and legal independence from the main EA organizations. That would require either community funding, or a long-term grant. I was envisioning that such an organization should be available to coordinate the investigation of alleged misconduct by senior EAs, and I think having certain survivor-support functions housed outside of CEA would serve the interests of both survivors and CEA (which then wouldn’t have to worry about managing potentially serious conflicts of interest).
I don’t have a clear opinion on whether / to what extent most of EA’s response to misconduct more generally should be housed in an independent organization.