I’m skeptical by default of accusations of sexual misconduct that don’t name the perpetrator, even when the source is anonymous, in 2023. That seems to include most of the accusations here.
Which is not to say definitively that the piece is untrue—everything in it could very well be accurate—just that the way the piece is now, it’s essentially set up to do maximum damage to EA while limiting EA leadership’s ability to take productive action against the offenders, and that makes me at least suspicious that events have been distorted.
I’m skeptical by default of accusations of sexual misconduct that don’t name the perpetrator, even when the source is anonymous, in 2023. That seems to include most of the accusations here.
Which is not to say definitively that the piece is untrue—everything in it could very well be accurate—just that the way the piece is now, it’s essentially set up to do maximum damage to EA while limiting EA leadership’s ability to take productive action against the offenders, and that makes me at least suspicious that events have been distorted.