I also think itâs quite reasonable for a religious person to give secular arguments for worldviews which also happen to be held in their religion.
For example, if Davis was making a humanistic argument for why people should take Giving What We Canâs 10% pledge, then accusing him of disingenuously trying to sneak in the âCatholic agendaâ of giving a tithe to the poor doesnât seem fair.
Or imagine if a Jain was giving a humanistic argument for why people should be vegetarian, and they were accused of disingenuously trying to sneak in the âJain agendaâ of animal welfare.
I also think itâs quite reasonable for a religious person to give secular arguments for worldviews which also happen to be held in their religion.
For example, if Davis was making a humanistic argument for why people should take Giving What We Canâs 10% pledge, then accusing him of disingenuously trying to sneak in the âCatholic agendaâ of giving a tithe to the poor doesnât seem fair.
Or imagine if a Jain was giving a humanistic argument for why people should be vegetarian, and they were accused of disingenuously trying to sneak in the âJain agendaâ of animal welfare.