Thanks Fai, I think you’re right. Somehow I didn’t notice James’s comment. James thanks for the clarification, I haven’t seen this risk before. Especially this part
This might mean we design superintelligent AGI that is okay with using animals as resources within their calculations, rather than intelligent and emotional beings who have the capacity to suffer.
I just thought that AI would take care of animal health in general, like the exact amount of food, humidity, water, etc. But I didn’t think about the raw calculations made by the AI.
Thanks Fai, I think you’re right. Somehow I didn’t notice James’s comment. James thanks for the clarification, I haven’t seen this risk before. Especially this part
I just thought that AI would take care of animal health in general, like the exact amount of food, humidity, water, etc. But I didn’t think about the raw calculations made by the AI.