Will you tag each EA forum post that is added to the Nonlinear library with the ‘audio’ tag?
I want to make sure we don’t duplicate these on the EA Forum Podcast or on Found in the Struce or elsewhere.
Of course sometimes a human reading might be worth doing on top of a machine-read one… but probably better to first focus on spreading the audio widely.
No, just because the tag would include a huge number of posts. It seems like a good heuristic to have dedicated tags in these cases. Moreover, the tag can be removed if we eventually don’t find it useful, whereas the reverse seems more complicated. (I emphasize that we can also tag these posts with ‘audio’; I’m only proposing that we use a special tag regardless of what other tags we use.)
Will you tag each EA forum post that is added to the Nonlinear library with the ‘audio’ tag? I want to make sure we don’t duplicate these on the EA Forum Podcast or on Found in the Struce or elsewhere.
Of course sometimes a human reading might be worth doing on top of a machine-read one… but probably better to first focus on spreading the audio widely.
If these posts are going to be tagged, I suggest using a special tag besides, or instead of, the ‘audio’ tag.
Why, because it’s a nonhuman voice?
No, just because the tag would include a huge number of posts. It seems like a good heuristic to have dedicated tags in these cases. Moreover, the tag can be removed if we eventually don’t find it useful, whereas the reverse seems more complicated. (I emphasize that we can also tag these posts with ‘audio’; I’m only proposing that we use a special tag regardless of what other tags we use.)