And if it’s the latter, it’s unclear to me why this idea would be better than just funding poor EAs directly and letting them decide where to live
That would cost much more per person. With that cost would come an expectation of filtering and grant proposals, which would keep out a lot of people who might otherwise use this to do good things.
Good point. Do you think EAs with more money ought to consider living in group houses for the sake of reducing the cost of living to enable them to donate more?
That would cost much more per person. With that cost would come an expectation of filtering and grant proposals, which would keep out a lot of people who might otherwise use this to do good things.
Good point. Do you think EAs with more money ought to consider living in group houses for the sake of reducing the cost of living to enable them to donate more?