When I make a decision, I care more about how good the outcome of the decision is than how mathematically consistent my process for making the decision is. My decision making, in practice, is fuzzy, time constrained, and rarely formalized.
Do you think that the alternative you discuss in this post are more likely to lead quicker, better answers? Or is this post more just calling out the deep mathematical foundations of typical decision decision making progress, even if they’re fine to use practice?
Do you think that the alternative you discuss in this post are more likely to lead quicker, better answers?
Yes.
Or is this post more just calling out the deep mathematical foundations of typical decision decision making progress, even if they’re fine to use practice?
I think the approaches I criticize do not work practically, at all, except by basically embedding a different, functional process within them (which people often do without realizing it, and which has major downsides).
When I make a decision, I care more about how good the outcome of the decision is than how mathematically consistent my process for making the decision is. My decision making, in practice, is fuzzy, time constrained, and rarely formalized.
Do you think that the alternative you discuss in this post are more likely to lead quicker, better answers? Or is this post more just calling out the deep mathematical foundations of typical decision decision making progress, even if they’re fine to use practice?
Disclaimer: didn’t read much of the post.
Yes.
I think the approaches I criticize do not work practically, at all, except by basically embedding a different, functional process within them (which people often do without realizing it, and which has major downsides).