The article is by Ben Todd, not Cody :) The fuller quote from Ben in the article is
If we were to expand this to also include non-measurable interventions, I would estimate the spread is somewhat larger, perhaps another 2–10 fold. This is mostly based on my impression of cost-effectiveness estimates that have been made of these interventions — it can’t (by definition) be based on actual data. So, it’s certainly possible that non-measurable interventions could vary by much more or much less.
Ah thanks for pointing out my mistake! And yes, I read this paragraph in the article, but still couldn’t work out how they could provide such a precise range
The article is by Ben Todd, not Cody :) The fuller quote from Ben in the article is
Ah thanks for pointing out my mistake! And yes, I read this paragraph in the article, but still couldn’t work out how they could provide such a precise range